10th Honda Civic Forum banner

1 - 2 of 2 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
143 Posts
Discussion Starter #1
http://www.autoblog.com/2016/02/22/honda-civic-turbo-manual-feature/



You could almost hear it. There was a furor. And it all had to do with a transmission. On September 16, Honda showed the all-new, tenth-generation Civic. Fitted with a turbocharged engine for the first time, enthusiasts were excited. Until they realized the new 1.5-liter Earth Dreams four-cylinder turbo would only be offered with a continuously variable transmission, something that elicits a passionate, all-consuming, and utterly unquenchable hatred among (most) enthusiasts.

Honda was listening. On the recent Civic Coupe launch, the company confirmed to us that a manual transmission will soon be offered on turbocharged Civics, regardless of body style. And then we drove a prototype.

Now, let's be very clear, the car we drove was an early test vehicle. It was camouflaged, cobbled together – it was born with a turbo and an automatic before Honda's engineers got their hands on it – and to cap it all off, we got approximately five minutes of seat time. We couldn't even shoot the darn thing, which is why you're looking at one really bad iPhone picture up top. But five minutes is better than nothing at all, right?

Our immediate impression is that even though this is an early development vehicle, fitting the 1.5-liter turbo with a manual transmission is a natural pairing. This is largely because the engine and transmission are so good on their own. We've raved about the turbocharged four-cylinder and its ultra-broad torque peak before – all 162 pound-feet of torque are on tap between 1,700 and 5,500 rpm – but the six-speed stick is no slouch either. Normally paired with the 2.0-liter, naturally aspirated four-cylinder, the clutch's action is light and springy, and finding the catch point is easy. And the shift lever, in typical Honda fashion, has a smooth, enjoyable action and easy-to-access gates.

Putting the turbo and manual together doesn't transform a normal Civic into an Si or Type R, but it automatically (sorry) makes for a more engaging and entertaining compact sedan. Because of the broad torque curve, more speed is just a single-gear downshift away. And that downshift is downright easy to kick out, too. Simply put, the turbocharged engine feels more urgent and eager, especially off the line, with the manual. There's a sense of lag on the CVT car that just isn't there in this prototype,

There are still a bunch of questions that haven't been answered about this pairing, partially because of Honda's cagey attitude about details. We don't know if the manual will be offered across turbocharged trim levels or if it will just come to the base EX-T model. In fact, we don't even know when Honda will begin offering turbo/manual cars in dealers (it'll be model year 2017 at the earliest). And when that day comes, we don't even know if Honda will go whole hog across all three body styles or if it will be a staggered release. And while we'll continue to pester Honda for those details, we're happy knowing that the company has listened to the pleas of enthusiasts. The resulting product is showing a lot of promise at an early stage.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
66 Posts
The title of the thread is 1.6T, but shouldn't it be 1.5T?


I've been waiting for the 4 door hatchback with manual trans. Hopefully it will be worth the wait.


Last year I was ready to replace my 2007 Honda Fit Sport 5MT with the new Mk7 VW Golf, but I waited for the 2016 models with the CarPlay infotainment feature that mirrors a smart phone. I was planning to take that leap this spring, then I got wind of the new Civic with better fuel economy and Honda reliability. I want a 4 door hatchback with manual trans in trim higher than LX and it looks like that will become a reality, but when?


By the time 2017 rolls around I'll probably get wind of the next generation Mazda3. Reports are they will correct the noise issue, which has been the biggest drawback for me.


I'm beginning to suspect these auto makers are in collusion with my wife, who is of the opinion my Fit (currently 113k miles) is good for another 100k. She's probably right about that, but I've been jonesing for a better (quieter) highway cruiser that's still fun to drive and has an up-to-date infotainment system.
 
1 - 2 of 2 Posts
Top