I should explain one other thing about this dyno chart.
Do you see how the graph never makes it to redline and has strange looking "curly q's" at the end? I'm almost positive this is due to the CVT transmission...it will never reach maximum RPM under power. In addition, it seems the ECU or CVT may have some sort of torque sensing function that determines the best spot (max torque) to hold the RPMs at under full load. That is why you see the difference in powerband maximum RPMS between the car with and without the Injen intake.
I will reach out to Injen regarding this to see if they have any more information.
EDIT: Injen did confirm the CVT and factory ECU behavior is quite inconsistent. Injen did about 8 baseline runs, and another 8 or so after the intake install. The intake showed consistent gains, although the amount did vary. The total range of these variances was between about +22hp and +40hp. They also brought in multiple cars and re-tested. They also did not change the fuel (87 octane was used) or feed in any cold air.
Do you see how the graph never makes it to redline and has strange looking "curly q's" at the end? I'm almost positive this is due to the CVT transmission...it will never reach maximum RPM under power. In addition, it seems the ECU or CVT may have some sort of torque sensing function that determines the best spot (max torque) to hold the RPMs at under full load. That is why you see the difference in powerband maximum RPMS between the car with and without the Injen intake.
I will reach out to Injen regarding this to see if they have any more information.
EDIT: Injen did confirm the CVT and factory ECU behavior is quite inconsistent. Injen did about 8 baseline runs, and another 8 or so after the intake install. The intake showed consistent gains, although the amount did vary. The total range of these variances was between about +22hp and +40hp. They also brought in multiple cars and re-tested. They also did not change the fuel (87 octane was used) or feed in any cold air.